Inconssitency between The two jades? Dark exploits
Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 3:47 pm
I just realized something about the jade who is still out in the alpha timeline with her cute dress, and Gi Jade with her cute toebean combat gloves....
I think that the Jade on the outside might actually be fully physically female without these bec alterations.
If we go back to Roxy and Calliopes nonbinary scene. You would think that she would empathize with this cause... Well she would have a dongo, and maybe also a vagigi we don't know entirely. Her parts aren't how they should be because of her Bec fusion.
But in Candy, its pretty clear she does have a dongo and is likely suffering some kinda dysphoria from it. And of course she had Yiffy with Rose.
In fact i don't think there is even a moment of doubt that Jade can have Children in meat, even a mention. It was only in candy, and i know there is different focuses in meat and Candy, but there would be a moment where Jade would likely mention it and more empathize than be confused.
So quite literally we may have a jade who is fully physically female, and a jade who is a hermaphrodite.
WTF is going on?
I think the reality is, that whenever something is unsaid in paradox space and uncertain, it can be altered or fleshed out and become reality.
LEt's look to pesterquest. During Equiss route, during his bad end, there are literally three possible reasons on how Equiss broke his horn, all seemingly valid and true at the same time.
And of course we have elements of someone appearing quite suddenly or gaining odd traits. Hiveswap is such an example as it suddenly pulls an entire incident and two kids out of the shadows of Jake Harley's past.
I think this is implying that unless it is shown 'in canon' or discussed, things can be altered. Its like a soft retcon, you add or alter things through what is unseen and unsaid, like how a Writer can pull out a new character quite suddenly. The loophole of vagueness. The difference between Candy and the Alpha timeline i think is that you don't need logic and distinct origin that makes sense. It does not need to be conssitent. In a sense someone made jade into a hermaphrodite cause it was never discussed whether or not her parts remained as they were after fusing with Bec. Altering the past and prior preconception in order to do so. And it doesn't even make other Jades like that either cause of the isolated and usntable nature of Candy.
In fact it seems as if the very timeline of Candy is different in HS2 than it was in the epilogues.
Who knows how far this could extend too. We have the other locked timeline that the pesterquest reader entails. I think while a lot of the character momenets and reveals are thus canon, there could be sooo many details that are sustained there but not compatible with the ARchitecture of canon and the characters.
Its like what happened with DAve actually. We all thought the familial struggles with him and his brothers were 'lol' but then nopes, turns out it was super abusive and weakened him.
I think that the Jade on the outside might actually be fully physically female without these bec alterations.
If we go back to Roxy and Calliopes nonbinary scene. You would think that she would empathize with this cause... Well she would have a dongo, and maybe also a vagigi we don't know entirely. Her parts aren't how they should be because of her Bec fusion.
But in Candy, its pretty clear she does have a dongo and is likely suffering some kinda dysphoria from it. And of course she had Yiffy with Rose.
In fact i don't think there is even a moment of doubt that Jade can have Children in meat, even a mention. It was only in candy, and i know there is different focuses in meat and Candy, but there would be a moment where Jade would likely mention it and more empathize than be confused.
So quite literally we may have a jade who is fully physically female, and a jade who is a hermaphrodite.
WTF is going on?
I think the reality is, that whenever something is unsaid in paradox space and uncertain, it can be altered or fleshed out and become reality.
LEt's look to pesterquest. During Equiss route, during his bad end, there are literally three possible reasons on how Equiss broke his horn, all seemingly valid and true at the same time.
And of course we have elements of someone appearing quite suddenly or gaining odd traits. Hiveswap is such an example as it suddenly pulls an entire incident and two kids out of the shadows of Jake Harley's past.
I think this is implying that unless it is shown 'in canon' or discussed, things can be altered. Its like a soft retcon, you add or alter things through what is unseen and unsaid, like how a Writer can pull out a new character quite suddenly. The loophole of vagueness. The difference between Candy and the Alpha timeline i think is that you don't need logic and distinct origin that makes sense. It does not need to be conssitent. In a sense someone made jade into a hermaphrodite cause it was never discussed whether or not her parts remained as they were after fusing with Bec. Altering the past and prior preconception in order to do so. And it doesn't even make other Jades like that either cause of the isolated and usntable nature of Candy.
In fact it seems as if the very timeline of Candy is different in HS2 than it was in the epilogues.
Who knows how far this could extend too. We have the other locked timeline that the pesterquest reader entails. I think while a lot of the character momenets and reveals are thus canon, there could be sooo many details that are sustained there but not compatible with the ARchitecture of canon and the characters.
Its like what happened with DAve actually. We all thought the familial struggles with him and his brothers were 'lol' but then nopes, turns out it was super abusive and weakened him.